State v. Davenport
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
We shall first consider tbe exceptions to tbe refusal of bis Honor to sustain tbe motions to quash tbe bills of indictment.
Notwithstanding tbe various grounds advanced for quashing these bills, tbe motions in fact point out but two alleged defects in' them: (1) Tbat tbe bills do not set out in tbe first count tbe plan, scheme or contrivance by which tbe conspiracy was to be executed; and (2) tbat tbe indictments do not allege any offense against tbe criminal laws of tbe State.
A bill of indictment, charging “a conspiracy to cheat and defraud need not charge tbe means to be used” in tbe…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- State v. . WhitesideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. . PottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.