Legal Opinion
State v. Cronin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 5, 1979No. 791SC49PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Judge.
The defendant has brought forward on appeal four assignments of error. Each of those assignments involves ques*417tions concerning the essential elements of the crime of obtaining property by false pretenses. G.S. 14-100. To evaluate those assignments in an orderly manner, we will, therefore, first examine and discuss the essential elements of that crime.
The crime of obtaining property by false pretenses has existed as a statutory crime in North Carolina since 1811. See 1811 N.C. Sess. Laws Ch. 814 § 2. Since that time, the elements of the crime have been set forth in many cases.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Town of Blowing Rock v. GregorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997