Legal Opinion

State v. Cronin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1980No. 96PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s failuré to dismiss the charges against him. Defendant contends that the court should have allowed his motion made at the close of the State’s evidence to dismiss the bill of indictment for failure to charge every essential element of the offense of obtaining property by false pretenses.

Initially, we note that since defendant contended that the bill of indictment failed to charge an offense, he should have moved to dismiss pursuant to G.S. 15A-954(a)(10) which by virtue of the provisions of G.S. 15A-952(d) may be made at…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. McNeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. State v. AdcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. GappinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. SheppardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API