Legal Opinion

Lane v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 9, 1984No. 73, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, Judge.

A Montgomery County jury found appellant and his co-defendant, Donald Harmon, guilty of two counts of theft of property worth $300.00 or more from the Steed Mortgage Company. Md.Ann.Code 1957, art. 27, § 342 (1982 Repl. Vol.). The Court (McAuliffe, John, J.) sentenced him to three years incarceration with all but three months suspended in consideration of three years probation.

Appellant raises three issues:

I. That'the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for theft because adequate security was transferred to the mortgage company in exchange for the mortgage loans.

II.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Gladden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  5. Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fraidin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Cardin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Hobby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LevinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API