Fairchild v. Bay Point & Clayton Railroad
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs in an action brought to recover for services performed under a written contract, consisting of laying track in the construction of a railroad; also to recover damages alleged to have been caused by defendant in delaying the performance of the work. The appeal is upon the judgment-roll.
On the eleventh day of June, 1907, the plaintiff Fairchild entered into a written agreement with the defendant, wherein Fairchild agreed to lay the first section of a certain broad gauge railroad, being approximately ten and one-half…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Courteney v. Standard Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Clark v. DuttonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Martyn v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Scoville v. KeglorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- De Arman v. ConnellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Howard v. D. W. Hobson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.