Courteney v. Standard Box Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, denying a new trial. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action by plaintiff to recover the sum of $3,509.82, alleged to be due and owing from defendant to plaintiff for certain goods, sold and delivered to the former by the latter. The cause was tried by a jury, by whom a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $2,808.08. Judgment was entered accordingly.
The defendant prosecutes this appeal from the order denying its motion for a new trial, and complains: 1. That the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict; 2. That the court erred, to its prejudice, in certain rulings upon questions involving the admissibility…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Selleck v. FrenchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Swinnerton v. Argonaut Land & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Coburn v. GoodallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Easterbrook v. FarquharsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Conderback, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Chase v. National Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.