De Arman v. Connelly

The defendants have prosecuted this appeal from a modified judgment in favor of plaintiffs rendered by the court after a trial of the cause was had before the court, without a jury. The appeal is also taken from an order of the court denying a motion of defendants for a new trial and directing that findings theretofore made be amended and the judgment entered in conformity with such findings be modified.

The principal contention advanced by appellants upon this appeal is that the evidence which is presented by the reporter’s transcript shows that the respondent Frank T. De Arman was guilty of…