Howard v. D. W. Hobson Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The second amended complaint in this action is in four counts. In the first count it is alleged that D. W. Hobson Company is a corporation having its principal place of business in San Francisco; that, prior to the sixth day of November, 1912, Maud Moore was the owner of a certain tract of land in Colusa County; that, in March, 1912, "plaintiff informed said defendant and its agents that he could obtain an option giving him the exclusive right to purchase said land for the sum of $25,000 and said defendant, then and thereby and through its authorized agents, agreed to and with plaintiff that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Gorham v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Estrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Williams v. KinseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Simmons v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.