Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Webster & Webster, T. H. Selvage, J. J. Cairns, and Webster, Webster & Blewett, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action for the purpose of recovering the sum of $815.60, with interest from October 23, 1909, said sum representing, it is alleged, the purchase price of fish sold and delivered by plaintiff and his assignors to the appellant.
J. P. Meng, who was made a party defendant, was not served with summons, and the appellant was, therefore, alone proceeded- against. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 414.)
The cause was tried by jury and a verdict returned awarding plaintiff the total sum declared upon, with interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum, from the twenty-third day of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Courteney v. Standard Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Easterbrook v. FarquharsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Heald v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by35 opinions
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Lindblom v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Producers Fruit Co. v. GoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.