Warner v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
The complaint herein alleges the following : Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, Inc., defendant and respondent herein, publishes in its Central Section of the Los Angeles Extended Area telephone directory, the following: “Warner, Caryl atty, 639 S Spring—• TUkr 9171 Woodland Hills Office, 21042 Rios—DIamnd 85761”; immediately below, “Warner, Caryl Mrs. 1600 Westrly Ter — NOrmndy 22011”; and below that, “Warner Caryl Mrs. Warner Caryl atty 21042 Rios Wdlnd Hills — DIamnd 85761.” The “Mrs. Caryl Warner” first listed is the divorced wife of Caryl Warner, an attorney; plaintiff, the other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Ambassador Petroleum Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Loock v. Pioneer Title Insurance and Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Child v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Miracle Adhesives Corp. v. Peninsula Tile Contractors' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- County of Alameda v. CliffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Edwards v. CurryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Hagan v. FairfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.