Legal Opinion

Loock v. Pioneer Title Insurance and Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1935No. Civ. 1541PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Polly Loock and Henning Loock, Sr., are the divorced parents of Henning Loock, Jr., who is a minor under the age of fourteen 3?'ears. The parents entered into a property settlement agreement which was approved in the decree of divorce. The custody of the minor was given to the mother. The property settlement agreement contained the following provision: “In the event of the sale of the property described herein as Parcel 1, the second party is to place Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars of the proceeds thereof in some reliable bank or Trust Company, in trust, for the education of said minor…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Young v. New Pedrara Onyx Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Fox v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Townsend v. TallantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Dixon v. GriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Neilson v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Spackman v. GoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Estate of LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Guardianship of WaltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Schram v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  5. Toomey v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API