Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Curry

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1957No. Civ. 5475PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

The record comes to us on the clerk’s transcript and judgment roll. As found by the trial court, sitting without a jury, plaintiff George F. Edwards was a roofing subcontractor on a school job for defendant I. C. Curry, the general contractor. Cross-defendant J. S. Schirm Company was the materialman supplying Edwards. The school was being built pursuant to a contract between Curry and the San Diego Unified School District, which is not a party to this action, in accordance with certain plans and specifications. Edwards agreed with Curry to furnish labor at a specified minimum hourly wage…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hollywood Wholesale Electric Co. v. John Baskin, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Totten v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Modesto Building & Loan Ass'n v. WyldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hanson v. CordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Warner v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Westwood Building Materials Co. v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Iowa Supply Co. v. Grooms & Co. ConstructionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Westwood Bldg. Materials Co. v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. J. S. Schirm Co. v. Rollingwood Homes Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Central Ready Mix Co. v. John G. Ruhlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API