Legal Opinion

Lightsey v. Marshall

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1999No. 19537PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, J.

{1} Plaintiff Dorothy Lightsey appeals from the judgment of the district court partitioning two separate properties, which the district court held to be the subject of a joint venture between Lightsey and Defendant Jimmy Marshall and ordering Lightsey to pay Marshall $5000 to equalize the parties’ joint venture agreement. Lightsey contends on appeal that the district court erred in entering its judgment because (1) Marshall did not properly plead and substantial evidence did not support the existence of a joint venture, (2) the joint venture agreement failed to satisfy the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. First Pennsylvania Mortgage Trust v. Dorchester Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Mascarenas v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Farmers, Inc. v. Dal MacHine & Fabricating, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Malnar v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hernandez v. Mead Foods, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. SaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Gamboa v. UrenaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Wilger Enterprises, Inc. v. Broadway Vista PartnersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Carpenter v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Apodaca v. Young American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API