Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Mead Foods, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1986No. 8472PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a denial of workmen’s compensation benefits. The major issues raised concern whether plaintiff has recovered from his injuries and whether plaintiff is still disabled. The minor issues concern failure of the trial court to include overtime wages in its calculation of wages for the limited time during which plaintiff was disabled, and failure to award some past and future medical benefits, vocational rehabilitation benefits, and attorney fees.

We affirm.

I

Plaintiff is a 26-year-old laborer. Prior to his employment with defendant Mead’s bread plant,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Garcia v. Genuine Parts Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Medler v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sanchez v. Homestake Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Lyon v. Catron County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Las Cruces Professional Fire Fighters & International Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Levario v. Ysidro Villareal Labor AgencyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Mayeux v. WinderNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Grine v. Peabody Natural ResourcesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API