Legal Opinion

Farmers, Inc. v. Dal MacHine & Fabricating, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1990No. 18916PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

This controversy arose out of a transaction involving the sale and delivery of a trailer. In June 1985, while on personal business, appellee Jack Ogden learned that appellant Farmers, Inc. (Farmers) was interested in purchasing a gooseneck trailer. As a result, Ogden referred Farmers to Valley Farm Parts (VFP), an equipment dealer in Wilcox, Arizona. Apart from being a customer of both Farmers and VFP, Ogden had no association with either party. In July 1985, Farmers ordered a gooseneck trailer through VFP for the price of $5,800 delivered to Deming, New Mexico. Dal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Las Luminarias of the New Mexico Council of the Blind v. IsengardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Charles C. Harbin and Patricia A. Harbin v. Assurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Texas National Theatres, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. WeberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. SerranoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Investment Co. of the Southwest v. ReeseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Robertson v. Carmel Builders Real EstateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State Ex Rel. King v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Phifer v. HerbertNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API