Legal Opinion
Gamboa v. Urena
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 4, 2004No. 23,104PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} In this case we consider the reach of the Construction Industries Licensing Act (CILA), NMSA 1978, §§ 60-13-1 to -59 (1967, as amended through 2003), which precludes an unlicensed contractor from seeking compensation for construction work that can only be performed by a licensed contractor. Defendant Sal Urena appeals from partial summary judgment voiding his material-man’s lien and dismissing his claim for compensation related to the fabrication and installation of cabinets and countertops in the home of Plaintiffs Daniel and Paula Gamboa. Under the circumstances of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Mascarenas v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Kaiser v. ThomsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Little v. JacobsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Fowler Brothers, Inc. v. BoundsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Little v. BaigasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Reule Sun Corp. v. VallesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- Romero v. ParkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.