Legal Opinion

Miller v. Sacred Heart Hospital

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 2000PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Linda Miller, Executrix of the Estate of Anna G. Walters, appeals the trial court’s order granting motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of all defendants. Miller asserts that the court erred because it failed to require the defendants to establish the prerequisites for entry of a sanction order prescribed by our decision in Steinfurth v. LaManna, 404 Pa.Super. 384, 590 A.2d 1286 (1991). We conclude that Steinfurth is inapposite and that the trial court acted properly in awarding summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order.

¶ 2 This action arises out of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Brannan v. Lankenau HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Swartley v. HoffnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Eaddy v. HamatySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Steinfurth v. LaMannaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Lineberger v. WyethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Devine v. HuttSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Rauch v. Mike-MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Chenot v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API