Legal Opinion

Steinfurth v. LaManna

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1991No. 904PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

This is an appeal from the March 9, 1990 order granting summary judgment to appellees, Dr. John V. LaManna and Proserpi-Moser Plastic Surgery Clinic. Summary judgment was premised upon a sanction order precluding appellants, Betty Jane and Robert Steinfurth, from introducing expert testimony on the issue of Dr. LaManna’s malpractice. Since we consider the sanction order inappropriate under current authority, we reverse.

Appellants instituted this action on September 22, 1986, alleging that Dr. LaManna negligently treated Mrs. Steinfurth. In 1982, Mrs. Steinfurth underwent a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Dion v. Graduate Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Pride Contracting, Inc. v. Biehn Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Brophy v. BrizuelaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Brunetti v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Miller v. Sacred Heart HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Rohm and Haas Co. v. LinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Grandelli v. Methodist HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 5Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Ellenbogen v. PNC Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API