Legal Opinion
Simms v. U.S. Government Printing Office
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 3, 2000No. Civ.A. 98-2399(JR)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff sues under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging racially discriminatory denial of job training and retaliation for filing an EEOC complaint. Defendant moves to dismiss or for summary judgment. The motion for summary judgment must be granted because plaintiff asserted his discrimination claim too late, and because plaintiff has not made out a prima facie case of retaliation. 1
Background
Between 1991 and July 1992, Charles Simms, a long-time Government Printing Office (“GPO”) employee, was detailed as a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Marshall County Health Care Authority v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Valerie Harlston v. McDonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sewell v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Dickerson v. SecTek, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Nurriddin v. O'KeefeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Hussain v. PrincipiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Hampton v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.