Legal Opinion
Dickerson v. SecTek, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 13, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-0877(ESH)PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs TaWanda Waters, Cleo Dickerson, and Angela Reed claim that their employer, SecTek, Inc. (“SecTek”), and their former supervisor, Thomas Smith, engaged in disparate treatment discrimination based on sex, hostile work environment harassment, and retaliation in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C.Code § 2-1401 et seq. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all three counts. As to disparate treatment, defendants argue (1) that plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate adverse employment action; (2) that…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Bell v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Brown v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Ihebereme v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Hussain v. PrincipiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.