Legal Opinion
Hampton v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 13, 2011No. Civil Action 07-2221(ESH)PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Karl Hampton was terminated from his position as a Foreign Service Officer for the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and has now sued his former employer, claiming discrimination on the basis of his race, retaliation for engaging in protected activity, and a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion will be granted in part and denied in…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Karl Hampton v. Tom VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Slate v. Public Defender Service for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.