Legal Opinion
Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 25, 1987No. 84-1232PublishedCited by 460 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
This an appeal by Plaintiff Marguerite Hicks (“Hicks”) from a judgment by the district court in a Title VII action in favor of Gates Rubber Company (“Gates”). The case arose out of a series of incidents that occurred during a brief, eight month period of employment of Hicks by Gates. Stripped to its essential elements, Hicks’ claim was that she was subjected to racial harassment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1982), and that she was subjected to racial and sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982). In…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by460 opinions
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Gorzynski v. Jetblue Airways Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Annabelle Lipsett v. University of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Yvette Cruz v. Coach Stores, Inc., David Otani, William Betts, Diane Lewis, Sara Lee Corporation, and Herve HeriveauxCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
455 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.