Legal Opinion
Thill v. Johnston
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1910No. 9157PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, McMaster, J., entered February 11, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
This is an action to enforce specific performance of the following contract:
“This agreement executed in duplicate this 2d day of November, 1903, by and between William Thill, party of the first part, and Adam Johnston and Matilda Johnston, parties of the second part, all of Thurston county, Washington, witnesseth:
“That whereas on November 2d, 1903, party of the first part and party of the second part, Adam Johnston, agreed to purchase the following described property to wit: E% of NE1?4 and N)/2 of SE1^ section 14, township 16 north, range 2 west, W. M., in Thurston county, Washington, from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Swash v. SharpsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Nichols v. OppermannWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Graves v. GravesWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Tingley v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Chamberlain v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Gerard-Fillio Co. v. McNairWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Richardson v. Taylor Land & Livestock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- Hendry v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- France v. Deep River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.