Legal Opinion

Hendry v. Bird

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1925No. 18793. En BancPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The amended complaint, on which trial was had, alleges in substance that the defendants are husband and wife; that defendant A.F. Bird at all times mentioned was an officer of the Pure Milk Dairy, a corporation of Seattle, and that plaintiff was superintendent of the dairy; that, in December, 1916, the defendant A.F. Bird orally agreed with the plaintiff that he would buy fifty-one per cent of the capital stock of the corporation for the use of the plaintiff and defendant, and further orally agreed that the plaintiff should pay him for one-half of said stock the sum of $3,000, to be paid in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Scott v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Keith v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Swash v. SharpsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Thompson v. New South Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sherman v. HainesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Puget Mill Co. v. KerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Cone v. ArissWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lectus, Inc. v. Rainier National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API