Legal Opinion

Clinton v. Shaw

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1943No. Civ. No. 13810PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.

Respondents moved to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that appellants’ brief was not filed within 30 days after the filing of the transcript on appeal, as prescribed by rule I, section 4, Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal. Upon the hearing, appellants presented oral, but no written, opposition to the motion and the same was granted. In ordering a rehearing, leave was granted to appellants to present written opposition, which has been done in the form of an affidavit of the attorney for appellants.

The transcript was certified by the trial judge May 4, 1942, and was…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. McCabe v. HealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Shain v. People's Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Brooks v. Union Trust & Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Carter v. PaigeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cornell University Medical College v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Strong v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API