Legal Opinion

Childress v. Peterson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1940No. Civ. No. 2715Published

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, Acting P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal because appellants' opening brief was not filed within the time provided by section 4 of rule I of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

Our record shows that the cleik’s and reporter's transcripts were filed on June 22, 1940. On August 19, 1940, respondents filed their notice of motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants ’ opening brief was filed on the same day. This has been held a sufficient answer to the motion to dismiss. (Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal. App. 55 [297 Pac. 564] ; North v. Evans, 114 Cal. App. 714…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Toth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Hall v. WolfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. North v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Lisle v. RagleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API