Legal Opinion

Magee Carpet Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1954No. Appeals, No. 27PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

These appeals are from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission of August 12, 1952. This order denied petitions for rehearing in the proceeding in which the Commission by order dated February 14, 1951, found a fuel adjustment clause of the Pennsylvania Power and Light Company to be unreasonable' and ordered its modification; and it amended *441the order of February 14,1951, to include a finding that refunds, in an amount to be determined .at a subsequent hearing, were due-to certain consumers from February 19, 1951, the date when the Power Company, received…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Penna. R.R. Co. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Slate Belt Electric Street Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Equitable Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API