Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Public Service Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 26, 1937No. Appeals, Nos. 286 and 287PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The Pennsylvania Railroad Company and Reading Company have appealed from an order of the Public Service Commission sustaining two complaints of the *560Diamond Glass Company that certain intrastate freight rates which it has paid the appellants were unjust, unreasonable, oppressive and extortionate, and fixing the extent of the unreasonableness.

The Diamond Glass Company manufactures glass containers at its plant on the Reading railroad at Royersford, Pa., and purchases glass sand in carload quantities at Mapleton, Pa., on the Pennsylvania. Shipments are made in box cars…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Centre County Lime Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Centre County Lime Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Magee Carpet Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API