Legal Opinion

Heilbron v. Superior Court of Sacramento

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1907No. Sac. No. 1536PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition directed to the ■Superior Court of Sacramento County. Peter J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The Sacramento Southern Railroad, a corporation, commenced proceedings against petitioner, to condemn a strip of land for railroad purposes. Trial was had, judgment passed for plaintiff, the damages for the value of the land to be taken and for the injury which would result to the remaining lands of defendant being assessed by a jury. Defendant then gave notice of intention to move for a new trial, and at the same time perfected her appeal from the judgment, which appeal is still pending. Plaintiff deposited in the superior court the amount fixed by the judgment and gave notice that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steinhart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Redevelopment Agency v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. NeiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. City of Burbank v. NordahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API