Legal Opinion
City of Burbank v. Nordahl
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 19, 1962No. Civ. 6604PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
The issues on this appeal concern, (1) the amount of interest payable to the defendants in an eminent domain action when the plaintiff takes possession of the subject property prior to payment of the sum prescribed by the interlocutory judgment therein; (2) the validity and effect of a stipulation; (3) the amount of the fee allowable to an appraiser-witness appointed by the court, who testified in the trial of the action; (4) the right of such plaintiff to recover costs on account of a change of venue made upon motion of the defendants; and (5) the right to recover costs of a deposition not…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kaps Transport, Inc. v. HenryAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Kilroe v. TroastSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- City of Hollister v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of Downey v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Southern California Gas Co. v. Joseph W. Wolfskill Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.