Legal Opinion

Spring Valley Water Works v. Drinkhouse

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1892No. 12,623PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Motion in the supreme court for a writ of restitution. The facts are seated in the opinion of the court,.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

After judgment was entered in the trial court, July 27, 1887, in favor of the plaintiff, for the condemnation of 14.45 acres of defendant’s land to public use as part of a reservoir site (compensation and damages to defendant being assessed at $5,103, and $100 costs), and pending defendant’s appeal therefrom, the court below, upon due application therefor by. plaintiff, entered an order October 8, 1887, under section 1254 of the Code of Civil Procedure, authorizing the plaintiff, upon paying into court $5,000 in addition to the amount of the judgment, to take possession of and use the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Evans & Howard Fire Brick Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Steinhart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Schubert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Davidson v. Texas & New Orleans Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  5. Yndart v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API