Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Romley v. Hauser

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2005No. CV-04-0321-SAPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Justice.

¶ 1 Real party in interest Mark Dancy was indicted for theft of a means of transportation, a class three felony, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 13-1814 (2001). The State amended the indictment to allege prior offenses for purposes of sentencing enhancement under A.R.S. § 13-702.02 (2001). The amendment alleged that Dancy had committed theft, a class six felony, on February 24, 1991, for which he was convicted on July 22, 1999, and possession of marijuana, also a class six felony, on April 28, 1994, for which he was convicted on January 21, 1997.

¶…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. ChristianArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. EagleArizona Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Fogliano v. BRAIN EX REL. CTY. OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API