Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 30, 2011No. 2 CA-CR 2010-0396PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Following a jury trial, Kyle Smith was convicted of two counts of aggravated driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) arising from the same incident. The trial court suspended the imposition of sentence, placed Smith on concurrent, three-year terms of probation, and ordered that he be imprisoned for four months pursuant to AR.S. § 28-1383(D)(l). On appeal, the state challenges the trial court’s determination that Smith is eligible for probation. In his cross-appeal, Smith challenges the court’s failure to strike a juror for cause and one of its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. SepahiArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. ViramontesArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Javier Francisco NavarroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. State of Arizona v. Luis Armando PerazaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. State v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. State v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. State v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API