Legal Opinion

Fogliano v. BRAIN EX REL. CTY. OF MARICOPA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 6, 2011No. 1 CA-SA 11-0204PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORRIS, Judge.

¶ 1 The fundamental issue in this special action is whether Proposition 204, a voter-enacted initiative expanding the number of A’izonans “eligible” to receive Medicaid benefits, requires the Legislature to appropriate supplemental funding to serve this expanded population. Although we agree with Petitioners Proposition 204 directs the Legislature to provide supplemental funding from “any other available sources,” whether the Legislature has complied with this directive presents a political question not appropriate for judicial resolution. This is because determining…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Trustmark Insurance v. Bank One, Arizona, NACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People's Advocate, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Rios v. SymingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. BrainCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Puente v. AslCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API