Fogliano v. BRAIN EX REL. CTY. OF MARICOPA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge.
¶ 1 The fundamental issue in this special action is whether Proposition 204, a voter-enacted initiative expanding the number of A’izonans “eligible” to receive Medicaid benefits, requires the Legislature to appropriate supplemental funding to serve this expanded population. Although we agree with Petitioners Proposition 204 directs the Legislature to provide supplemental funding from “any other available sources,” whether the Legislature has complied with this directive presents a political question not appropriate for judicial resolution. This is because determining…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Trustmark Insurance v. Bank One, Arizona, NACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- People's Advocate, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Rios v. SymingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. BrainCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Puente v. AslCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022