Legal Opinion

State v. Satterfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1980No. 113PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant was served with a nontestimonial identification order on 30 March 1979 directing him to submit to procedures for collection of saliva, blood and pubic hair samples at the Iredell Memorial Hospital Emergency Room. The procedures were conducted on 2 April 1978, and the samples were personally delivered by an officer of the Statesville Police Department to David Hedgecock, a forensic serologist employed by the SBI, for analysis and comparison.

At trial, defendant sought to suppress the results of Mr. Hedgecock’s analysis by interposing a general objection to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Currence v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. RoperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. TorainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API