Legal Opinion

State v. Bass

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 9, 1972No. 78PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice:

The first assignment of defendant Bass is based on the contention that since he did not sign a written waiver of his right to counsel at the lineup when he was exhibited to the prosecuting witness for identification, the lineup was illegal and his subsequent in-court identification by Sandra Garner was tainted and inadmissible. He therefore argues that his motion to suppress her in-court identification should have been allowed.

At all times pertinent to this case, an indigent defendant in a capital case could not waive the right to counsel either orally or in writing. See 1969…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API