State v. Bass
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice:
The first assignment of defendant Bass is based on the contention that since he did not sign a written waiver of his right to counsel at the lineup when he was exhibited to the prosecuting witness for identification, the lineup was illegal and his subsequent in-court identification by Sandra Garner was tainted and inadmissible. He therefore argues that his motion to suppress her in-court identification should have been allowed.
At all times pertinent to this case, an indigent defendant in a capital case could not waive the right to counsel either orally or in writing. See 1969…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.