Albillo v. Intermodal Container Services, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOI TODD, J. *
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Respondents are related transportation entities. The two primary companies are Intermodal Container Service, Inc. and Interstate Consolidation Service, Inc. 2 A division of Intermodal does business as Harbor Rail Transport; a division of Interstate does business as Cartage Service. Together, these entities are involved in local and interstate intermodal freight transportation, which involves the use of two or more modes of transportation for the continuous movement of freight from origin shipper to destination receiver. Intermodal motor…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Curle v. Superior Court of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Ditropan XL Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers v. Landstar SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies, AGDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Scottsdale Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Landstar System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.