Legal Opinion

Scottsdale Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 2005No. B170163PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPENCER, P. J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and cross-defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company (Scottsdale) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant and cross-complainant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) and defendant Commercial Underwriters Insurance Company (CUIC) after the trial court granted their motions for summary judgment. We conclude the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment and therefore reverse the judgment.

FACTS

This case arises out of an accident that occurred on July 31, 1998. Miguel Llamas (Llamas), an employee of VCP Cable…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Britts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. California Public Records Research, Inc. v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Joannou v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Wollmer v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Encompass Insurance Co. v. Coast National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API