In Re Ditropan XL Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS DIRECT PURCHASER’S COMPLAINT AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ALZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS INDIRECT PURCHASERS’ COMPLAINT
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
Now before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss the two consolidated class action complaints filed by plaintiff American Sales Company (“ASC” or “Direct Purchaser Plaintiff’) 1 and by City of Fargo Health Trust Fund, Local 28 Sheet Metal Workers Fund, United Food & Commercial Workers Union & Employers Midwest Health Fund, Plumbers & Pipe-fitters Local 572 Health & Welfare Fund,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- In Re Flash Memory Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- In Re Flonase Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.