Legal Opinion
Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies, AG
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 26, 2004No. CIV. 3:00CV524PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of the Defendants, Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. and Infineon Technologies Holding North America, Inc. (hereinafter collectively “Infineon”), pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 15(a), to amend their Answer and Counterclaims against the Plaintiff, Ram-bus, Inc. (“Rambus”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion for leave to amend is granted.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
To help put Infineon’s motion for leave to amend in context, it is necessary briefly to survey the history of the case,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Aron v. U-Haul Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Brown v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Transwitch Corp. v. Galazar Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Curry v. South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.