Legal Opinion
Garofalo v. Squillante
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 14, 2000No. AC 19241PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the named defendant, Angelo Squillante,2 on his counterclaim to collect an unpaid balance of a debt evidenced by a promissory note. The plaintiffs claim that the court *689improperly (1) concluded that the defendant’s claim was not barred by the statute of limitations and (2) made certain findings of fact relating to the payment of the debt. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts, which are relevant to this appeal. “In 1978, General Sanitation, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. KirshnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Zapolsky v. SacksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Powers v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Roberts v. CatonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Keefe v. Norwalk Cove Marina, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rosenfield v. I. David Marder & Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Fleet National Bank v. LahmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- D'Amato Investments, LLC v. SuttonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- JSA Financial Corp. v. Quality Kitchen Corp. of DelawareConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- LoRicco v. Hula's New Haven, LLCConnecticut Superior Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.