Legal Opinion
Miller v. Kirshner
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 23, 1993No. 14438; 14439PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court, Hon. Joseph F. Morelli, state trial referee, finding the defendant, Hal Kirshner, to be the father of the child of the plaintiff, Mary Miller, and ordering the defendant to pay a support arrearage, weekly child support until the child’s eighteenth birthday and attorney’s fees. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) admitted the results of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) test of the defendant; (2) evaluated the credibility of the witnesses by concluding that the plaintiff’s testimony was more credible than that of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Smith v. SnyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. ArenaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Weidenbacher v. DuclosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.