D'Amato Investments, LLC v. Sutton
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*420 Opinion
BEACH, J.
This case involves the interpretation of a commercial lease and a personal guarantee of that lease. The plaintiff, D’Amato Investments, LLC, brought this action against the defendant, David Sutton,1 to recover the amount allegedly due under a commercial lease between the plaintiff and Chimaera, Inc. (Chimaera), pursuant to a guarantee signed by the defendant. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly failed to find that the defendant is liable for (1) the unpaid amounts owed by Chimaera for the period subsequent to the expiration of the lease and (2) select unpaid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Smithfield Associates, LLC v. Tolland BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Garofalo v. SquillanteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Hudson United Bank v. Endeavor GroupConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jenzack Partners, LLC v. Stoneridge Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Meeker v. MahonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- A.T. Clayton & Co. v. HachenbergerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- LoRicco v. Hula's New Haven, LLCConnecticut Superior Court · 2013
- Gugliemi v. Willowbrook Condominium Assn., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.