Legal Opinion

Thomas v. New York Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 117, Calendar No. 36,894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

The case was tried before the court without a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s proofs, defendant moved for a directed verdict on the grounds of lack of negligence of defendant and of contributory negligence of plaintiff’s decedent. The term “directed verdict” is a misnomer on trial before the court but we apprehend it was used as a convenience to express the claim that, taking the facts most favorable to plaintiff, he was not entitled to recover. The court entered judgment for defendant.

Decedent and another woman, riding west in an automobile, were struck and killed by defendant’s train…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elrich v. SchwadererMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Nichols v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Downey v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Rosencranz v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Ackerman v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schillinger v. WymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Beasley v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Waterstradt v. Lanyon Dock Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Ashworth v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lather Ex Rel. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Michigan Public Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API