Legal Opinion

Rushford-Surine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1927No. Docket No. 52PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Accepting the opening statement of plaintiff's counsel as the facts in the case and all of them, as we should, it is established that when the decedent and his companion were approaching the track and for 50 feet back from the track they had an unobstructed view in the direction the train was coming from for a distance of from 600 to 1,000 feet. Their truck could have been stopped in 5 or 6 feet going at the rate of 10 or 12 miles an hour. They were going up hill. If they drove that distance without stopping their car or looking for a train, or if they saw the train when they could and should…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Knickerbocker v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Molby v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Champaign v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. West v. Detroit Terminal RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schillinger v. WymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Brady v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. DeCorte v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Buchthal v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Benaway v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API