Legal Opinion
Abebe v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 2009No. 05-76201PublishedCited by 179 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per. Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Judge CLIFTON; Dissent by Judge THOMAS.
ORDER
The per curiam opinion that was filed November 20, 2008, was filed in error. The opinion accompanying this order is substituted as the opinion of the court. The previously filed concurrence and dissent are unaffected by this order.
The petition for rehearing remains pending. Within 14 days, respondent shall file a response to the petition. Petitioner may reply within 14 days of the response; the reply shall not exceed the length permitted for the response. See 9th Cir. R. 40-1.
OPINION
2Per curiam
1. Petitioner became a lawful…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by179 opinions
- Halim v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Ahmed v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Moris Quiroz Parada v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Roberto Silva-Pereira v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Aguilar-Ramos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.