Legal Opinion
Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2004No. 02-70887PublishedCited by 1,887 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether we have jurisdiction to consider a due process claim that the petitioners did not present to the Immigration and Naturalization Service or to the Board of Immigration Appeals.
I
Baltazar Hernandez Barron and Margarita Hernandez Ramirez (“the petition ers”) are married natives and citizens of Mexico who illegally entered the United States near San Ysidro, California in February 1985 and January 1988, respectively. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) began removal proceedings against them on July 11, 1997 after serving Notices to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Aysar Abdulrahman v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,887 opinions
- Santos-Lemus v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mohinder Singh v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Abebe v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Tijani v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Hongke Zhang v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
1,882 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.