Legal Opinion
Halim v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 30, 2009No. 04-74868PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CALLAHAN; Concurrence by Judge CUDAHY.
*973CONSUELO CALLAHAN, Judge:
Maikal Ali Iskandar Halim (“Halim”) seeks review of the denial of his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) based on his fear of being persecuted due to his Chinese ethnicity should he return to Indonesia. We affirm the denial of relief because we conclude that Halim has not made a compelling showing that (1) the reported incidents of discrimination amount to persecution, (2) the incidents provide an objective basis for a well-founded fear of future…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gerardo Bibiano Falcon Carriche Theresa v. De Falcon Carriche and Christina Pamela Falcon Bibiano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Selamawit Zehatye v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Shpetim Hoxha v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Ali v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Chanpreet Kaur v. Robert WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Doris Rodriguez-Zuniga v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Salim v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Kwang Park v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.