Legal Opinion

McNeely v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1973No. 7319SC567PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The sole question for consideration is the propriety of the trial judge’s allowing defendant’s motion to dismiss under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(b). Appellant states in his brief that he presented ample evidence for his case to go to the fury. This case was, however, tried without a jury. Since the enactment of the new Rules of Civil Procedure in 1970, this Court has repeatedly distinguished between the motion for directed verdict under Rule 50 and the motion for involuntary dismissal under Rule 41(b). The former is proper when the case is tried before a jury, and the latter is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bryant v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Bryant v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Wells v. STURDIVANT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Jernigan v. ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Neff v. Queen City Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dean v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Musselwhite v. CheshireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. Greensboro Housing Authority v. Kirkpatrick & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. In re the Proposed Foreclosure of Claim of LienSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  5. WOODRIDGE HOMES LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API