In re the Proposed Foreclosure of Claim of Lien
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TIMMONS-GOODSON, Justice.
In this case we consider whether the trial court erred in granting a judgment and dismissal in favor of respondents pursuant to Rule 41 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, reasoning that petitioner’s lien and foreclosure claim against respondents’ condominium unit was invalid. We conclude that petitioner’s lien and foreclosure claim were based upon an improperly administered assessment and
*253not a valid debt. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
I. Background
Petitioner Starboard Association, Inc. incorporated in 1981 by filing its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Pue v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Dealers Specialties, Inc. v. Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Riley v. Ken Wilson Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- James River Equipment, Inc. v. Tharpe's Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Twin Towers Condo. Assn. v. Bel Fury Invest. GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Mancuso v. Burton Farm Development Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Johnson v. Starboard Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016